Monday, May 13, 2024

The Mark of the Rani [Doctor Who, Story 139]

 The Mark of the Rani by Pip & Jane Baker
2 - 9 February 1985


I don't know what it says about me that the first thing I said to myself was: "Is that a new cat pin?" Sure enough, Sixie has changed his out since Vengeance. It's good to know that my powers of observation have turned me toward productive ends.

The next thing I noticed was that Peri, while still not much of a fully-realized character or anything crazy like that, seems noticeably happier and has more personality in this story than usual. I note that this is one of the rare Who stories to actually be both written (by Jane Baker) and directed (by Sarah Hellings) by women, and wonder if that might have something to do with it. The last (also first) time this happened was with Enlightenment, written by Barbara Clegg and directed by Fiona Cumming, where Tegan notably got more to do than usual and some more focused writing. I may be imagining things, but it was nice to see Peri smile a little more and reveal her interests for what feels like the first time, when she talks about conservation and the chopping down of English hedgerows toward the start of the first episode.

There are still plenty of risible moments where she is concerned, of course. Here I'm thinking of the cliffhanger, where she accidentally pushes the Doctor's cart the wrong way and sends him rolling down a hill! (I thought it was pretty funny, but I can't fib and say it was a flattering character moment.) And toward the end of the story, when asked what she and the Doctor do in the TARDIS, the Doctor remarks wryly, "Argue, mainly." Don't say that like it's a good thing!

This is not the Master's most edifying hour, coming into the story disguised as a scarecrow with one of his most bonkers plans yet. (Still, it must be said, not quite as bonkers as the one from The King's Demons.) I wonder what fan's thoughts were at the time after his seeming death in the previous season? "Oh, not him again"? His presence does distract from the new villain a bit, but I did find his rapport and banter with her fairly entertaining.

Speaking of whom, Kate O'Mara is absolutely wonderful. I think it's a pity that her part here is a little underwritten and she doesn't get much time to be a true threat to the Doctor. It would have been for the best to withhold the Master and give her more room to get into conflict with the protagonists. Just the same, I enjoyed every moment she was on screen. Her dramatic exit with the T. rex embryos growing in her TARDIS got a real laugh out of me.

I've heard that Mr. and Mrs. Baker are known for their excessively verbose dialogue, but I was more thrown off by the Northumbrian dialect of the miners, which was at times a little difficult for my delicate Yankee ears to parse. BritBox subtitles came through for me on that front. The historical setting is an intriguing one, though I was forced to ask myself just how well-known George Stephenson really was, as I'd never heard of him before this. Is he more popular in his native Britain perhaps?

But do you know what the really odd thing is? Despite all the quibbles and the plot basically being held together by string, I really, really enjoyed this. It's inoffensive, it's cute, and it has a bit of manic energy to it that I'd take over Attack of the Cybermen any day. I can't bring myself to give it a negative review.

Is it already another anniversary year? The Two Doctors is next.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 13 May 2024.)

Sunday, May 12, 2024

Grave Matter [Doctor Who, Diversion 34]

 Grave Matter by Justin Richards
1 May 2000

Good grief, has it really been almost three years? The last novel I reviewed for the marathon was The Well-Mannered War in October 2021. Time commitment issues, you see. I'm hoping to rectify this, and have added three more Sixth Doctor novels after this one to make up the difference.

I felt a bit like I had stepped back in time with this one. No, not to 2000, but rather to the Hinchcliffe-Holmes era. Between the foggy, out-of-the-way English setting, Victorian trappings, gothic horror, and more zombie movie references than I could shake a stick at, this feels at first like a story that Tom and Louise should be wandering through rather than Six and Peri. But initial appearances can be deceiving.

The Doctor and Peri spend much of the first act of the book noticing and investigating small anachronisms on the island of Dorsill, leading the reader to perhaps suspect temporal interference at first. This culminates in a moment where the Doctor sees the tell-tale lights of a helicopter landing on an adjacent island and shouts for everyone not to panic, only for the bemused residents to remark that he acts like he's never seen a helicopter before. Brilliant!

As it turns out, they only assumed they'd arrived in the past because the island they've landed on has chosen to maintain a pre-industrial society. This turns the whole premise on its head, and makes the decision to use Six and Peri settle into a kind of sense. It now becomes obvious that this story was made for them.

In typical Who fashion, the source of all the trouble ends up being an alien, a non-sentient microbe (the eponymous matter) which is capable of regenerating the bodies of its hosts from even the most grievous of injuries. The effects of this are sometimes grisly, especially in the case of hosts whose bodies are damaged to the point of death. As the microbe evolves and takes over human minds, it begins to take drastic measures to preserve and spread itself.

The creepiest thing about it is that its hosts are fully aware of everything that's going on, even when their body is being puppeted around. This reminded me very strongly of the (slightly earlier) science fiction series Animorphs, where the chief antagonists are a species of slug-like aliens who can do the same thing. This realization, which comes later in the novel after Peri is taken over, retroactively makes scenes where we see infested barmaid Liz Trefoil stare blankly at the zombie-like shape that used to be her lover, Dr. Madsen, come alive again with a fresh sense of horror.

All this body horror is well-rendered, and needless to say, both easier to stomach and to get away with than the televised material it's fitting into. The prose medium puts us at a little bit of a remove and takes a bit of the edge off of the worst of it.

The character writing is the strongest aspect of this book, in my opinion. The author not only captures Six and Peri, but introduces a large and memorable cast of side characters, making their dropping off one-by-one all the more riveting. If I had any one complaint about Grave Matter, it would simply be that the solution to the problem feels a little bit too easy, and that I find it hard to believe that the Doctor didn't consider the risk of flying hosts when he departs and leaves the story on an ambiguous note.

It wasn't enough to detract from my enjoyment very much, however; I thought this was both a very solid book and a nice addition to the Sixth Doctor's career. I'm hoping that my other literary diversions later on are just as interesting.

The Mark of the Rani is next.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 12 May 2024.)

Friday, May 10, 2024

Vengeance on Varos [Doctor Who, Story 138]

 Vengeance on Varos by Philip Martin
19 - 26 January 1985


I love television, don't you? To tell you the truth, I'm more the sort to only follow a few series, but obsessively. A habit I am now trying to break, but given the fact that I am still here posting about Doctor Who, you can probably conclude that my success has been limited.

Doctor Who has always been pretty self-aware of its status as a TV show, whether in its limitations or its possibilities. The TV screen as a portal or doorway to a fantastical world is a motif that is common all across television, but seems especially prevalent in Who - here I'm thinking of The Mind Robber and Carnival of Monsters, but also the TARDIS scanner itself, which has been compared to a television often enough. As Rosa pointed out in Loups-Garoux, the TARDIS may very well run on imagination.

That the same means of accessing the realm of imagination could also carry with it unseen dangers is something which the program has not yet broached, with Vengeance on Varos perhaps the first story to do it explicitly. I wasn't alive for them, but I'm given to understand that the Eighties were a period where violence on television, and especially home media, was becoming more and more of a hot-button issue. The anxieties of this period are reflected in this story, in Varos' major export of televisual torture "entertainment".

This is played out across what is a delightfully grotesque and dark story. Although Robert Holmes' name isn't on it, Vengeance on Varos still feels like it has inherited a lot of its DNA from stories like The Sun Makers. Colin Baker's Doctor seems particularly well-suited to stories of this type, so it's good to see him in this setting.

The way it starts is just electric, immediately establishing the sort of society they have on Varos by way of the commentary between Arak and Etta (Clara's grandma! I almost didn't recognize her). Keeping these two in something like the role of the ancient Greek chorus, commenting on the action but never a part of it, was an inspired choice, and made their scenes very entertaining.

The whole guest cast is on point for this one. Quillam (delectably evil), the Chief Officer (quite good), and of course Sil (the little freak!) all make for some memorable characters. The Governor is also quite good, dignified but sad. His voice was familiar, but I had to look him up to find that Martin Jarvis also voiced the propaganda reel in Invasion of the Dinosaurs. I think it's pretty funny that he is in more or less the same line of work in this one!

Ironically, despite showing to us the face of a society rendered insensate to violence, the story is fairly violent itself. Less so than Resurrection in the previous season, of course, but still notably so. Much is made of the Doctor's struggle with the two guards at the acid bathing chamber; for the record, I think the Doctor is off the hook for that one, the first guy tripped and then pulled in the second himself. This irony feels intentional, however, and the violence feels more tongue-in-cheek this time, rather than existing solely for shock value.

I quite liked this one. I hope to see more of its like before this Doctor has gone.

For the first time in a while, we'll be headed to the literary realm next time with Grave Matter.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 10 May 2024.)

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Attack of the Cybermen [Doctor Who, Story 137]

Attack of the Cybermen, authorship disputed
5 - 12 January 1985
 

That certainly is an odd authorship situation this story has got going on. I'm almost certain that Eric Saward was indeed the primary creative force here, because this story feels very much like his in its tone and content. Which of course doesn't eliminate the possibility that others had a significant hand in it, as claims have been made over the years. Though why anybody would want to claim this particular story is beyond me...

It's really a pity that this story shows some promise in its first episode. The chameleon circuit being fixed for a bit, the return to Totter's Lane, and catching up with Lytton again all caught my interest a bit, and the location shooting (except for on Telos, which is even grayer than it ought to be because of the filter they've put on it) generally looks good.

Whatever favorable elements this story has quickly retreat into the background as the plot comes to the fore, and it becomes obvious that Attack is a huge mess. The Cybermen's plan makes only approximate sense, and despite being the gun that Earth is under, Halley's Comet (contemporary touch right there) is missing as a presence in the story for most of its duration. The Cryons are rather uninteresting, but are only a part of the complete lack of interest offered by the second part of the story, a dull runaround punctuated only by bizarre levels of violence (Lytton's hands) or curious performances (the pair of escaping prisoners who seem to believe that shouting = acting).

Perhaps the most puzzling decision of this story was to use Lytton as the object of a "don't judge a book by its cover" moral. Nothing in Resurrection ever gave much of an impression that there was more to this character than a thug and a bully, and frankly, nothing in this story really did either. We are told by the Cryons that Lytton is helping them, but it doesn't come across on screen very well, and the Doctor's regret over misjudging him at the end feels very misplaced.

All in all, not a strong start to the season. I wish I had more of interest to say about it, but alas, it failed to command my interest in the first place.

Vengeance on Varos is next.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 9 May 2024.)

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Cities Made of Song, 1984

 

Cities Made of Song, 1984 - Grow Old With Me by John Lennon


"Grow old along with me
Whatever fate decrees
We will see it through
For our love is true"

And so we have our first musical interlude since just before Castrovalva. The Fifth Doctor era is book-ended by Cities Made of Song, which I guess is kind of poetic. I never really intended the gap between these to get as long as it did; it's just that I got embroiled in a series of protracted delays, hiatuses, and anxieties that compelled me to crack on with the TV reviews to the exclusion of everything else.

This album, partly recorded around August 1980, happens to represent some music from within that gap. A bittersweet sort of accident that nevertheless feels right, somehow.

Ages ago, long before that constant series of distractions, I dedicated two different Cities Made of Song posts to the Beatles, specifically A Hard Day's Night and A Day in the Life. These happened to snapshot the band at two of the most triumphant parts of their careers: the peak of Beatlemania, and their transition to the studio where they sought out new musical heights. By necessity, we didn't spend much time on all the drama, pre- or post-breakup, which has defined much of these musicians' history.

Quite by accident, both of those songs were largely conceptualized by John Lennon (though Paul McCartney collaborated on both, particularly on the latter). While George Harrison easily remains my favorite Beatle, and Paul has had a long and varied career to put any pop artist to shame, Lennon's life and musical career have always fascinated me. A mercurial, opinionated, and often controversial figure, he lived his life from one extreme to another without compromises.

Yoko Ono had an extensive career as a photographer and artist well before ever meeting Lennon, but as a matter of course, she is best known for her 12-year relationship with Lennon, a partnership which was itself quite controversial. Their relationship infamously began as an affair while both were still married to other people, after a gradual courtship originally sparked by their shared interest in avant-garde art. Shortly after recording their first experimental music together, and marrying in 1969, the two staged their "Bed In" protest for peace in Amsterdam, earning some notoriety for the stunt, and for the remarks to the press they soon made a habit of.

Their adversarial relationship with the British press (in particular, the constant racist and sexist abuse heaped onto Ono) eventually drove the couple to America, where they settled in New York. Their life there wasn't any less fraught, including more than one attempt by President Richard Nixon to have Lennon deported and a "Lost Weekend" where the pair were separated for eighteen months after Lennon was unfaithful.

After reconciling, Ono and Lennon would have their first child, Sean Ono Lennon, in 1975, marking the beginning of a 5-year long withdrawal from the public eye to raise their son. This seems to have been a constructive period for Lennon in particular, who spent the time working on himself and enjoying the chance to be a "house-husband" out of the limelight.

This belated honeymoon period finally drew to a close when Ono and Lennon returned to the studio in mid-1980 to record a collaboration together, which was released in November as the electrifying "Double Fantasy". Sporting a black-and-white photo of the couple kissing, the album alternated songs by Lennon and Ono, focusing on themes of love, loss, reconciliation, and new chances. Lennon's (Just Like) Starting Over was the A-side for the single off of that album (the B-side being Ono's Kiss, Kiss, Kiss) and reflects his newfound optimism:

"It's time to spread our wings and fly
Don't let another day go by, my love
It'll be just like startin' over."

In the end, Lennon and Ono would not have the chance to explore this future together, as Lennon was murdered on 8 December 1980. His death stunned the world, and saw "Double Fantasy" jump to number one on the album charts in both the US and UK. Many negative critical reviews of the album found themselves retracted or supplemented by more glowing ones in the wake of the event.

Lennon's sudden passing left behind a lot of unfinished material, including a follow-up album between the couple titled "Milk and Honey". In 1983, Ono resumed work on the project, which was finally released in January 1984. With a color picture from the same photo shoot as "Double Fantasy" on the cover, its resemblances to the previous record were more than superficial, as the format and tone of the music are largely the same as well.

The chief difference is the markedly more bittersweet tone, particularly to Ono's songs. Popular perception of Ono's music has been largely negative for most of her career, but I have to say that her work on both "Double Fantasy" and "Milk and Honey" is really interesting both lyrically and compositionally, even if her singing voice isn't the strongest. It has a frantic, modern sound to it that reminds me a bit of Talking Heads. It's very different from the surrounding Lennon songs, but I think they complement each other well, as the albums are supposed to be a conversation between the two halves of this partnership.

My favorite of hers on this record is You're the One, the final track, its refrain of "How could I tell you?" reflecting that even after all the years they spent together, she feels she never had the chance to really communicate the depth of her feelings. She reveals a lot about their relationship when she says:

"In the world's eye
We were Laurel and Hardy
In our minds
We were Heathcliff and Cathy
In a moment of wisdom
We were a wizard and a witch
In a moment of freedom
We were Don Quijote and Sancho
In reality
We were just a boy and a girl
Who never looked back..."

This song is a sort of reply to the one immediately before it, the final Lennon track on the album, Grow Old With Me. Like all of Lennon's songs on "Milk and Honey", it's a lo-fi piece, basically an unfinished demo with nothing more than John's voice, a piano, and some incomplete verses. It's no less powerful, even in this threadbare form, as Lennon's command of lyrics and melody still shine through. Robert Browning's poem "Rabbi Ben Ezra" lent the song its title and first two lines. There is apparently another literary reference here, to the Tang dynasty poet Bai Juyi, at the start of the next verse:

"Grow old along with me
The best is yet to be
When our time has come
We will be as one

[...]

"Grow old along with me
Two branches of one tree
Face the setting Sun
When the day is done"

Where Starting Over becomes bittersweet only in hindsight, Grow Old With Me is haunting. Lennon, at 40, would have started to face the prospect of aging; something he would ultimately never have the chance to do. A promise to Ono that they would be together even in their advanced age becomes a missed opportunity, a chance stolen from them.

In Ono's decision to finish and release the album, I see a bit of defiance, an insistence that their love has not ended, even after their time together on this earth has run its course, that their love goes on through their music.

Every life leaves work undone. Songs unfinished. Things left unsaid. Our lives are constantly unfolding, each chapter written before the ink of the previous has a chance to dry. One day we'll run out of time, and our pens will still. It's a tragedy that Lennon died just as he was coming to terms with his past, changing his ways, and in the words of his old "Sgt. Pepper's" song, "getting better". But John and Yoko never looked back, just as You're the One said. The messy, imperfect romance between these messy, imperfect people left no room for regrets. But it did leave behind a musical legacy worth admiring, and a reminder that love - and art - endure even beyond death.

"God bless our love, God bless our love."

Back to television shortly. Attack of the Cybermen is next.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 7 May 2024.)

Monday, May 6, 2024

Doctor Who, Season 21


I've committed a small crime by including The Five Doctors in this season even though it's a special, and not technically part of any season. It's a crime which I'll repeat many, many times for my own convenience, I promise.

Season 21 is quite the interesting beast, boasting a few very high quality stories mixed in with some relative duds. At the very least, none of them were forgettable. This last stretch of the Davison era has been a roller coaster, including the great stories, the misses, and the one-by-one departures of its TARDIS team until we're left with Colin's Doctor and Peri in a very curious coda.

On the whole, this mixed record gave the season a noticeably lower score average than the two seasons before it, but I still think I'll remember this experience fondly, if only because it marked the time where I managed to get back into the swing of this marathon. Finally!

Here's the score breakdown:

The Five Doctors - 9.00

Warriors of the Deep - 5.25
Part One - 6.00
Part Two - 6.00
Part Three - 4.00
Part Four - 5.00

The Awakening - 7.50
Part One - 7.00
Part Two - 8.00

Frontios - 9.00
Part One - 9.00
Part Two - 9.00
Part Three - 9.00
Part Four - 9.00

Resurrection of the Daleks - 5.00
Part One - 6.00
Part Two - 4.00

Planet of Fire - 6.25
Part One - 7.00
Part Two - 5.00
Part Three - 6.00
Part Four - 7.00

The Caves of Androzani - 10.00

Part One - 10.00
Part Two - 10.00
Part Three - 10.00
Part Four - 10.00

The Twin Dilemma - 5.75
Part One - 6.00
Part Two - 6.00
Part Three - 5.00
Part Four - 6.00


Best episode: The Caves of Androzani, Part Four - 10.00
Runner-up: The Caves of Androzani, Part Three - 10.00
Worst episode: Resurrection of the Daleks, Part Two - 4.00

Season 21 average: 7.16

Best guest appearance: Christopher Gable as Sharaz Jek (The Caves of Androzani)
Best special effect: The petrified Time Lords (The Five Doctors)
Best musical score: Frontios (Paddy Kingsland)

Before we move on to Season 22, our 1984 Cities Made of Song post is coming up next.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 6 May 2024.)

The Twin Dilemma [Doctor Who, Story 136]

The Twin Dilemma by Anthony Steven
22 - 30 March 1984
 

Is that what all the fuss was about?

It has to be said that years of hearing this serial roundly pronounced "one of the worst Doctor Who stories of all time" along with Time and the Rani (which I have also seen and which also isn't quite as bad as people say) gave me some elevated expectations.

Instead I found a story which is, while messy and full of misjudged moments, still very entertaining, if not always for the reasons it intended. Is it so bad it's good or is it just OK? I don't tend to differentiate, but suffice it to say that I had a bit of fun.

Our new leading man immediately makes a strong impression, his boisterousness and grandiloquent speech both miles away from his predecessor. I really love Colin's voice; it does make me sit up and pay attention, even when the lines he's delivering are not very good. There are still a few here that I did appreciate, like when he cheerfully informs the chamberlain, "I don't like you," or when he says, "I no longer know if I'm coming, or going, or even if I've been!" His chinwag with Mestor is also pretty good, for what it's worth.

These aside, I must admit that the dialogue is hilariously elevated in this script, and we also get 'oof' lines like "... and may my bones ROT for obeying it!" or "Our genius has been abused!" or "a manic-depressive paranoid personality!"

This script definitely needed a third or fourth or fifth pass, but such are the usual end-of-season woes, where there's just no time. This makes the decision to slot this here instead of at the start of the next season very questionable indeed.

Story-wise, it is kind of interesting to see the Doctor struggle so much with the regeneration process, but in practice it is handled pretty messily. By far the worst part of this is the infamous scene where the Doctor tries to choke Peri, which is just as uncomfortable as I expected.

Still, aside from that one, the other moments mostly fall into the territory of lovable schlock. Looking back 40 years later it's easy to laugh when it's no longer "the story that killed Doctor Who". I had fun, but I am still hoping to see some more promising stories in the next season.

But first, our Season 21 roundup, coming soon.

(Modified from the original posted at Gallifrey Base on 6 May 2024.)